Capsular Contracture: Reconstructive Breast Surgery or Revision Aesthetic Breast Surgery?

http://www.drbriandickinson.com/

As I continue to learn about both aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery, I find that the same tools, skill sets, and planning that I use for aesthetic breast apply to reconstructive breast surgery and vice versa.

Frequently, I see many women in consultation who have undergone first a breast augmentation, second a breast reduction, and often present desiring further reduction of their breasts or require surgery for capsular contracture.

I enjoy these challenging cases as it is important to be knowledgeable of the blood supply of the nipple areola complex, the prior surgeries, and how to most effectively manage the capsular contracture.

Women who present after numerous operations often have thinning skin or breast tissue, asymmetry, capsular contracture, or unwanted motion of the implant, and desire correction.

I have found that the breast surgery techniques taught to me by Neal Handel, M.D. have been very effective for identifying, addressing, and managing these difficult cases. Capsular contracture can be very painful for the patient and interfere with daily activities and be psychologically distressing.

The patient in the above photograph is happy with her removal of her saline implants in exchange for silicone implants, change of implant plane, nipple areola reduction, and mastopexy. The scars are still hyperemic in this early one month post-operative result. I routinely educate patients that scars tend to be the most indurated and red approximately one month after surgery and then soften as the collagen in the scar remodels.

I have found that as larger saline implants are removed and exchanged for smaller lighter silicone implants, it is easier for patients to excercise, return to the gym, and loose weight.

http://www.drbriandickinson.com/

Mastopexy Augmentation Reductions.

http://www.drbriandickinsonmd.com/

Frequently, I encounter more women in consultation who present to my office desiring a revision of their breast augmentation from 8 to 10 years prior. Frequently these women have had saline breast implants in for almost ten years and now want to exchange their saline breast implants for silicone breast implants.

Often women who have had larger implants and now want to downsize desire to have the breasts placed more centrally on their chest wall away from their armpits, with a reduction in the size of their areola, and a lift of the breast.

Depending upon the age of the patient and whether or not she has had children and/or breast fed, the incision pattern used to make the breast appear more youthful depends upon the degree of breast ptosis. Breast ptosis or the "breast fall" can be corrected by different methods or incisions patterns depending upon the degree of breast ptosis. The youthful appearance of the breast is best corrected by the relationship of the nipple areola complex to the breast crease or inframmary fold.

I use in consultation, the breast ptosis method as classified by Regnault with modification: Grade 1 ptosis - The nipple areola complex has descend to the level of the inframammary fold. Grade 2 ptosis - The nipple areola complex has descended below the inframammary fold. Grade 3 ptosis - The nipple areola complex has descended below the inframammary fold with no lower pole tissue below nipple.

In general I have found that Grade I can be corrected with the placement of an implant and/or a superiorly placed crescent mastopexy incision. Often a Benelli type mastopexy can be incorporated to reduced the diameter of the nipple areola complex. Grade II ptosis often necessitates a vertical incision with/without a lateral limb extending from the nipple areola complex. Grade II ptosis often requires a vertical component and horizontal component(s) to make the breast appear youthful.

As one can understand from the photograph above in the after picture on the left, the breast appears more youthful based on the relative size of the nipple areola complex and its position relative to the breast crease. Furthermore the breast has been centralized with its take-off no further lateral than the anterior axillary line. This position of the breast on the chest wall facilitates physical exercise. At three weeks post-operatively, I anticipate that the scars will soften and the swelling will subside giving an even more natural and youthful appearance to the breast as time progresses. Full post-operative change and swelling takes approximately 6 months to one year.

http://www.drbriandickinson.com/

Secondary Mastopexy Augmentation/Reductions

Secodary Mastopexy/Augmentation reductions are common operations where women want their implants removed and then exchanged for smaller implants. Frequently patients also need a simultaneous lift when the volume of the breast is reduced. These operations are typically challenging. As one reduces the size of the breast or changes the shape of the breast, it is important to respect the blood supply of the nipple areola complex.

For example, this patient had a prior mastopexy augmentation via a superior crescent incision in the submuscular position. Therefore, one needs to be cognizant of the remaining blood supply when attempting to raise the nipple areola complex.

This patient underwent capsulectomy, bilateral removal and replacement of saline implants for Mentor smooth round high profile silicone gel implants, and mastopexy via an oblique pattern.

I have found that the vertical, oblique, and helium balloon pattern mastopexy (described by Dr. Ed Pechter of Valencia, California) to provide excellent projection while removing excess skin. I have found that many women appreciate the breast projection that these patterns in combination with the high profile implant provide.

http://www.drbriandickinson.com/